Thursday, August 18, 2016
SNEAK PREVIEW OF D4 COTTAGE
The cottage refurbishment near Herbert Park is nearing completion and this image shows the gallery bedroom with internal window facing front door. We provided an internal courtyard so that the floors area could be optimised.
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
TAX REDUCTION TO FIX HOUSING CRISIS (OPINION)
Now that we are on the verge of having a government of sorts in Ireland, at last, I expect they might look at the housing crisis and put something together to facilitate construction. It took a while for the penny to drop in government circles during the crash but the narrative went something like this: "The developers and their like ruined the country and so we hate greedy developers."
Construction then stopped and the dole queue grew. Jobs were now needed and guess what: if 4 are on the dole 2 are men and one of which is construction related unemployed and the industry shrunk to a tenth of it's former size it now dawns on us (government) that we must help construction. CIF said drop the VAT to 9% but FG/Lab got cute and said no, but we'll set up the HRI and lasoo a few cowboys into the tax net while we give the poor houseowner a break and a much needed wee extension.
I suppose at this stage we needn't demand too much government interference, as this normally unbalances the market, but perhaps further tax relaxation would be good. For starters reduce professional's VAT from the luxury 23% to the builders 13.5%. Also look at the full tax take on development and ease it so the ("nasty") developers get their profit. If the truth be known there will be no movement without developers profits. Comments welcome.
Construction then stopped and the dole queue grew. Jobs were now needed and guess what: if 4 are on the dole 2 are men and one of which is construction related unemployed and the industry shrunk to a tenth of it's former size it now dawns on us (government) that we must help construction. CIF said drop the VAT to 9% but FG/Lab got cute and said no, but we'll set up the HRI and lasoo a few cowboys into the tax net while we give the poor houseowner a break and a much needed wee extension.
I suppose at this stage we needn't demand too much government interference, as this normally unbalances the market, but perhaps further tax relaxation would be good. For starters reduce professional's VAT from the luxury 23% to the builders 13.5%. Also look at the full tax take on development and ease it so the ("nasty") developers get their profit. If the truth be known there will be no movement without developers profits. Comments welcome.
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Coastal Cottage
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
NEW CHURCH IN TALLAGHT
We will shortly be lodging a planning permission for this new church in Tallaght and in the design process saw it necessary to create a simple scale model to examine different fenestration options.
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Booterstown Completion ... Eventually
For reasons beyond the control of client architect and contractor this house extension and alteration was completed after a protracted delay to the start. The clients are to be commended for exhibiting something close to the patience of Job! Some things are worth waiting for and I trust that this project fits nicely into that category. I previously wrote about this project in an earlier post.
Thursday, August 20, 2015
"Opt out" might affect house value
My advise to clients would be to not "opt out" as this may effect your house value in the long run, not to mention the quality of construction. For all its faults the new Building Control Regulations (S.I.9) is increasing the culture of compliance which is the very thing that everyone sought in the first place.
At ABA Architects our recent experience is that we are seeing local authorities carrying out more inspections and their input has been helpful and beneficial to the projects. As always we are happy to advise you on the specifics of your project and the many legal requirements attached to same.
Monday, March 16, 2015
Refurbishment without Extension
Without an extension this house at Rosemount Crescent Dublin 14 was entirely refurbished. ABA Architects provided both an architectural service as well as an Interior design consultancy. Kitchen and Bedroom furniture was provided by Kelly Design Ltd. Contractor was Paul Gallagher of Mellor Enterprises Ltd. At ground floor level the Kitchen was opened to the dining and living space. Sliding double doors between front and rear reception rooms allowed the sunlight penetrate to rear of house. Separate WC and shower rooms off hall were altered to Visitors WC and passage to converted garage. Stairwell was refurbished and new opening provided to passage leading to relocated main bathroom at first floor level. Master bedroom was provided with dressing room and en-suite shower bathroom. A fresh contemporary look was provided to this 1950's house as well as insulation, plumbing, heating and electrical upgrades. More images are available on our Houzz website
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Urban Dentistry in Irishtown
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Hatch Street Revival
![]() |
| Photos by rosphotography.ie |
![]() |
| En-suite with concealed pipework |
![]() |
| Dining, Kitchen and Patio Garden |
![]() |
| Dining and Living with new sliding pocket doors |
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Creative in every way
Hats off to builder Con Corcoran of Creative Builders Ltd in his fine work at this extension in Artane which is nearing completion. ABA Architects were involved in the construction drawings, tendering and site operations but the design was prepared by Jerry Hannigan Architect and in my (completely unbiased) opinion I think all can see what a fine creation it is and how it cleverly exploits the southerly aspect to the rear. As I write clients are packing their toothbrushes for the big move in. Happy days.
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Hidden Column and Beam
When I designed the simple garden room extension to this Rathfarnham house I wanted the steel beam set into the floor zone but I chose to introduce a column to control the span of the steel and therefore its depth. I then chose to make a “cut out” feature beside this column to give a neat sculptural effect. The roof light in the picture as also statically positioned close to the old kitchen in order to optimise daylighting and sunshine. A high level window at the side facing south west also has a huge impact on the daylighting in this project. Hats off to builder Tommy Wade of Construction Development who kept us all smiling throughout.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Exempted on 2 counts
Designing a second extension beside an existing extension can be interesting. In this south Dublin project I wanted to modify the earlier extension but any such modification has to be under clause 4.1.h. of the 2000 Planning Act which defines a certain type of exemption: "development consisting of the carrying out of works for the maintenance, improvement or other alteration of any structure, being works which affect only the interior of the structure or which do not materially affect the external appearance of the structure so as to render the appearance inconsistent with the character of the structure or of neighbouring structures". This means that if the house had a pitched roof then the extension should too. The second extension on the left, which is exempt under the 2001 Planning Regulations, total extended area being under 40 sq.m., took its lead off the first but both were provided with gable walls and the opportunity for high level windows to allow good sun penetration. Each pitch roof also was given a ridge roof light which could be opened to allow...guess what...cooling! . Are we talking about Ireland?
Wednesday, July 2, 2014
NATURALLY COOL
We are entering the last 6 weeks on this house extension and renovation in Kildare town. The image shows the kitchen area on the left and the new sunroom on the right. The ridge roof window will have automatic openers, a perfect way of cooling this south facing room. With significant insulation upgrades throughout the house we have to give as much thought to cooling as heating. Our client on another project completed 18 months ago said that she hardly put the boiler on all winter and enjoyed great heating from the winter sun. When I look at house design the very first thing I do is establish the orientation of the house to optimises the passive solar heating dimension of the scheme.
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Extending an Art deco Home
There are very few art deco houses in Dublin which have not been ruined by out of character alterations and so it is a delight to be working on one at the moment where we are looking at a small extension to the rear, as well as some (in character) alterations. I'm considering corner sliding doors which open and leave the corner free, just the sort of thing they'd have done in the thirties if the technology allowed it! Delightful project and clients...who wouldn't want to be an architect on days like this!
Saturday, June 7, 2014
In Support of new Building Control (Amendment) Regulation (S.I.9 of 2014)
In support of SI9 I offer the following Opinion Piece.
Good for clients
At the end of the day the client will be sitting down in the new or extended house having a relaxing cappuccino and now with the added confidence that the team members have stood over their work. Construction is hugely complex and while normal projects with proper builders and professionals have been doing a good job for years much of their actions have not been codified and so the door was open for the shortcut brigade to get in there. Competence is now a legal requirement. While this is bad news for the incompetent it's good news for the client who has just made their biggest ever financial investment.
Good for architects
Architects will now be engaged on a fuller service and hence will be better able to control the build. While some projects had a full architectural service far more projects had none or only a minimal partial service. Architects, as well as engineers and building surveyors, have the skills and experience for the task and the wisdom to call in appropriate expertise for any gaps in this knowledge. Workload will rise for what still remains an extremely depressed profession. (the Architects Council of Europe (ACE) reported that average sole principals salary in Ireland drop from €75,000 in 2008 to €25,000 in 2012). The service of an Assigned Certifier is under a separate fee and agreement to the main fee. Yes it costs more but the benefit is the development of an (overdue) compliance culture in the construction industry.
What's the fuss?
If you are reading this article you, like myself, are a participant (or should I say “victim") of the Information Age where all can express opinions. Much fear has been spread about SI9 on all media and from my perspective I see these main reasons being:
1. SI9 came in too quickly.
The law was only published six weeks before enactment. In many cases this isn't a problem but with the huge complexity in this particular law problems arose. The minister's stated view that www had a year to prepare is questionable because the major part of that year was taken up by the stakeholders working with government to get the impossible SI90 of 2013 morphed into the (difficult but not impossible) SI9 of 2014. RIAI could not advise members on a law that was up in the air.
2. The online system was untested by all. It could not be seen before 1 March.
3. The framework and understanding for inspection plans was absent. This led to massive variation in interpretation of how many visits are needed.
4. Local authority staff could not be trained. There was virtually no time for this to happen.
5. RIAI information to members and public has been delayed. who have the capacity and mandate to advise members was slowed down by a new Council, elected prior to sight of SI9, on a platform of protest against its impossible predecessor SI80.
6. Self builders felt excluded. This was based on the wording under the signature on a Completion Certificate Part A which says: “to be signed by a Principal or Director of a Building Company only”. Both Minister Hogan and Martin Vaughan, assistant principal in the Architecture/ Building Standards section of DoECLG clarified “It is only where the assigned person is a company that the requirement applies that the signatory be a principal or director (i.e. not an employee)". While the wording on the cert suggests otherwise the lawmakers have clarified their intention and for this reason I believe any action against a self builder on this matter alone would fail.
7. Architectural Technologists (Technicians) were excluded. This is now being addressed I understand but it will require the legal creation of a register for Technologists so the matter cannot be fixed overnight. In the meantime Technologists can work as ancillary certifiers within the existing framework.
Many of these issues are now being addressed and more issues will no doubt arise but I believe it is too early to judge the merit of the actual law. Rightly or wrongly a "throw them in the deep end" decision was taken by government to proceed on 1 March and while some will drown most will (eventually) swim.
8. Architects feared impossible liability. This was the case in SI80 but SI9 is different in 2 critical respects. firstly the Ancillary Certificates can be relied upon by the Assigned Certifier. For example an engineer as an ancillary certifier might sign off on drains, foundations and steelwork. An architect (acting as certifier) can rely on this now and not "double check" these issues. Secondly the words "having exercised reasonable skill, care and diligence" are included in the Certificates. This is fundamental to normal practice and it means that for an action against an architect to succeed his/her "skill, care and diligence" will have to be proven to be unreasonable. Professional Indemnity Insurers were satisfied once these changes were made so I find the view that SI9 imposes significant additional risks to architects (acting reasonably) unsustainable .
What bits of the jigsaw are missing?
1. Latent defects insurance. This is a “solutions focussed” measure in the event of defects and is necessary for customer (and architect) protection.
2. Official RIAI documents for Architects and Clients.
3. Unity in RIAI. It would be timely for a reaffirmation of Article 2 of the RIAI Memorandum of Association which state (emphasis mine):
Good for clients
At the end of the day the client will be sitting down in the new or extended house having a relaxing cappuccino and now with the added confidence that the team members have stood over their work. Construction is hugely complex and while normal projects with proper builders and professionals have been doing a good job for years much of their actions have not been codified and so the door was open for the shortcut brigade to get in there. Competence is now a legal requirement. While this is bad news for the incompetent it's good news for the client who has just made their biggest ever financial investment.
Good for architects
Architects will now be engaged on a fuller service and hence will be better able to control the build. While some projects had a full architectural service far more projects had none or only a minimal partial service. Architects, as well as engineers and building surveyors, have the skills and experience for the task and the wisdom to call in appropriate expertise for any gaps in this knowledge. Workload will rise for what still remains an extremely depressed profession. (the Architects Council of Europe (ACE) reported that average sole principals salary in Ireland drop from €75,000 in 2008 to €25,000 in 2012). The service of an Assigned Certifier is under a separate fee and agreement to the main fee. Yes it costs more but the benefit is the development of an (overdue) compliance culture in the construction industry.
What's the fuss?
If you are reading this article you, like myself, are a participant (or should I say “victim") of the Information Age where all can express opinions. Much fear has been spread about SI9 on all media and from my perspective I see these main reasons being:
1. SI9 came in too quickly.
The law was only published six weeks before enactment. In many cases this isn't a problem but with the huge complexity in this particular law problems arose. The minister's stated view that www had a year to prepare is questionable because the major part of that year was taken up by the stakeholders working with government to get the impossible SI90 of 2013 morphed into the (difficult but not impossible) SI9 of 2014. RIAI could not advise members on a law that was up in the air.
2. The online system was untested by all. It could not be seen before 1 March.
3. The framework and understanding for inspection plans was absent. This led to massive variation in interpretation of how many visits are needed.
4. Local authority staff could not be trained. There was virtually no time for this to happen.
5. RIAI information to members and public has been delayed. who have the capacity and mandate to advise members was slowed down by a new Council, elected prior to sight of SI9, on a platform of protest against its impossible predecessor SI80.
6. Self builders felt excluded. This was based on the wording under the signature on a Completion Certificate Part A which says: “to be signed by a Principal or Director of a Building Company only”. Both Minister Hogan and Martin Vaughan, assistant principal in the Architecture/ Building Standards section of DoECLG clarified “It is only where the assigned person is a company that the requirement applies that the signatory be a principal or director (i.e. not an employee)". While the wording on the cert suggests otherwise the lawmakers have clarified their intention and for this reason I believe any action against a self builder on this matter alone would fail.
7. Architectural Technologists (Technicians) were excluded. This is now being addressed I understand but it will require the legal creation of a register for Technologists so the matter cannot be fixed overnight. In the meantime Technologists can work as ancillary certifiers within the existing framework.
Many of these issues are now being addressed and more issues will no doubt arise but I believe it is too early to judge the merit of the actual law. Rightly or wrongly a "throw them in the deep end" decision was taken by government to proceed on 1 March and while some will drown most will (eventually) swim.
8. Architects feared impossible liability. This was the case in SI80 but SI9 is different in 2 critical respects. firstly the Ancillary Certificates can be relied upon by the Assigned Certifier. For example an engineer as an ancillary certifier might sign off on drains, foundations and steelwork. An architect (acting as certifier) can rely on this now and not "double check" these issues. Secondly the words "having exercised reasonable skill, care and diligence" are included in the Certificates. This is fundamental to normal practice and it means that for an action against an architect to succeed his/her "skill, care and diligence" will have to be proven to be unreasonable. Professional Indemnity Insurers were satisfied once these changes were made so I find the view that SI9 imposes significant additional risks to architects (acting reasonably) unsustainable .
What bits of the jigsaw are missing?
1. Latent defects insurance. This is a “solutions focussed” measure in the event of defects and is necessary for customer (and architect) protection.
2. Official RIAI documents for Architects and Clients.
3. Unity in RIAI. It would be timely for a reaffirmation of Article 2 of the RIAI Memorandum of Association which state (emphasis mine):
"The main object for which the Institute is established is to undertake and encourage the general advancement of architecture for the benefit of the community and to promote and facilitate the acquirement of the knowledge of the various arts, sciences and skills connected therewith. The Institute seeks to achieve this object by being a centre of excellence for the advancement of education, information, advice and support in all matters related to architecture."
4. Better public understanding of the role and benefit of Architects.Even when patients die the medics get thanked for their care. Likewise architects deserve some respect for their service to people and that includes adequate payment which I am glad to see is actually written into SI9. Because Architects have been in an unmerciful construction recession client exploitation on fees has occurred. I myself have had the phone slammed down by angry clients when I informed that that I would charge for a call out.
Clients are the ones who now have additional duties and costs but the good news is that the building will be better as a result of this new law. For this reason, despite the problems, I support SI9.
Anthony Brabazon MRIAI is an architect and conservation architect in private practice at ABA Architects in Dublin. He is founder of RIAI Dublin Forum (for architects) and Help My House (for homeowners)
Friday, June 6, 2014
10,000 Pageviews..Hmmmm
We've passed a significant milestone with 10,000 pageviews. Not quite sure how to react to that! Hope you've enjoyed some of the posts. Life as an architect in post crash Ireland has been...challenging...but I've a (not so) secret confession..I love it! Thanks to all our clients, you've been great and I hope we've done our wee bit down the years to smarten up your home and life.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
New Building Control Regulations - what are they?
Since March 1st 2014 new houses, extensions over 40m2 and buildings which are subject to a Fire Safety Certificate (for example, certain alterations and most commercial work) are subject to new Building Control Regulations.
(i) Building owners (of the above) will now need to appoint a design certifier (an architect, engineer or building surveyor) prior to construction. The design certifier will confirm that the design complies with Building Regulations.
(ii) The building owner will also have to appoint an assigned certifier (an architect, engineer or building surveyor) to certify, along with the builder, during construction, that the building is constructed in compliance with Building Regulations.
These new duties are explained in more detail in the Code of Practice published by the Department of Environment,
In practice this will lead to greater oversight of both the design and construction processes but, being a private function, will attract more fees for the building owner. Our current estimate is that the service would increase the fees (to architect) by somewhere in the region of 20-35%.
Background
Approximately one year ago the Government and DoELG passed S.I. no. 80 of 2013 into law but it contained some fundamental flaws. A huge effort was put in (mainly voluntary) by RIAI committees, Council Members and staff, in conjunction with other stakeholders, to make the system workable and insurable. The outcome was the adoption of S.I no.9 of 2014 (replacing S.I.80 of 2013) in January of 2014 about five weeks before the enactment date of March 1st 2014.
Minister of DoELG Phil Hogan's view was that the RIAI, amongst other professional bodies, had a year to prepare it's members but, as the updated S.I. is only just out now, the RIAI has only recently begun to train it's members. The new mandatory online lodgement system (for Commencement Notices) only became available on March 1st and the entire system is a challenge to clients, practitioners and local authorities alike due to lack of any meaningful run-in period. We at ABA Architects, having undergone training, are prepared for the introduction of these new regulations and will continue to serve our clients in the best possible way. Enquiries can be sent to anthony@abaarchitects.ie .
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Irish Georgian Society Grants
| New Kitchen designed by ABA Architects |
The Irish Georgian Society has launched a new Conservation Grants Scheme to provide financial assistance for works to structures of significant architectural merit. The scheme will operate over a four year period with funding of approximately €50,000 to be made available in each year. Grants will be awarded in two categories: i, a core grant for one larger project that is considered of particular importance and which would especially benefit from the support of the Irish Georgian Society; ii, smaller grants for projects such as the repair of windows, fanlights, doorcases, ironwork, decorative plasterwork etc and for the provision of essential conservation advice. For advise on this and other available grants for construction projects contact ABA Architects. We are an RIAI practice accredited in Conservation at Grade III and can advise on this and other aspects of conservation and restoration.
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
COURTYARD OASIS
In this project in Phibsboro we were keen to create a bright interior and so in order to avoid a large rear extension darkening the main house we put a garden room pavilion at the end and created a glazed link library corridor. The garden then became a private courtyard oasis. A basement was also created below the rear garden room containing a utility room as well as a wood pellet boiler and plant room and a large storage room for wood pellets. A combination of external insulation, internal dry lining and new insulated cavity walls as well as other upgrades ensured that the BER rating went from G to B.
Friday, January 10, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















